Stability, Not Crisis: Medical Malpractice Claim Outcomes in Texas, 1988-2002
نویسندگان
چکیده
Using a comprehensive database of closed claims maintained by the Texas Department of Insurance since 1988, this study provides evidence on a range of issues involving medical malpractice litigation, including claim frequency, payout frequency, payment amounts, defense costs, and jury verdicts. The data present a picture of remarkable stability in most respects and slow, predictable change in others. We find no evidence of the medical malpractice crisis that produced headlines over the last several years and led to legal reform in Texas and other states. The rapid changes in insurance premiums that sparked the crisis appear to reflect insurance market dynamics, largely disconnected from claim outcomes. Controlling for population growth, the number of large paid claims (over $25,000 in real 1988 dollars) was roughly constant from 1991-2002. Controlling for the quantity of health care delivered (based either on real health care spending or number of physicians), the frequency of large paid claims declined over this period. The number of small paid claims declined sharply. Payout per claim on large claims was constant over 1988-2002, while jury awards were constant or even declined. Real defense costs rose at 4.4% per year, and produced an average 1% annual increase in the real total cost to insurers per large paid claim. Jury verdicts showed no significant trend.
منابع مشابه
Use of Nondisclosure Agreements in Medical Malpractice Settlements by a Large Academic Health Care System.
IMPORTANCE Honesty and transparency are essential aspects of health care, including in physicians' and hospitals' responses to medical error. Biases and habits associated with medical malpractice litigation, however, may work at cross-purposes with compassion in clinical care and with efforts to improve patient safety. OBJECTIVE To determine the frequency of nondisclosure agreements in medica...
متن کاملSeven reasons family doctors get sued and how to reduce your risk.
LU ST R A TI O N B Y E LI ZA B ET H L A D A W ith medical malpractice insurance premiums rising sharply across the nation and at least a dozen states facing an insurance crisis, physicians and policymakers are debating vigorously how best to respond. Tort reforms that would cap awards are among the proposals and have proven effective at moderating premiums in several states. [See “Understanding...
متن کاملMediation and medical malpractice: problems with definition and implementation.
An important aspect of the perceived problem with medical malpractice litigation is the manner in which malpractice claims are resolved.' Following the first medical malpractice crisis in the mid-1970s and the more recent difficulties with insurance costs and availability, the majority of states enacted legislation affecting the procedures used to resolve malpractice claims. 2 Procedural reform...
متن کاملAlternative Liability Regimes for Medical Injuries
In the U.S. physicians and other medical providers are subject to a negligence rule of liability. Under a negligence rule a patient who is injured as a result of medical care is entitled to compensation only if he or she can show that the injury was caused by the physician's failure to take due care. Given a finding of liability, compensation is determined by a civil jury. In recent years the f...
متن کامل